In 2019, Rasa was four years into leading a disputes team and had
started keeping an informal log of where the day went. The billable
work was not the problem. The problem was the gaps: finding the
current version of a provision, then finding whether anyone had
already researched it, then finding the precedent the firm actually
liked, then finding out who had the file.
Mantas had spent the previous decade building retrieval systems for
large document collections and had a matching complaint from the
other side. Legal text is unusually well structured — it is
versioned, cross-referenced and citation-linked by nature — and
almost none of that structure was being used to help the person
reading it.
The first version of Lexoria did one thing: it let you read
consolidated legislation as it stood on any given date, and see
exactly what had changed. It was narrow, and it was enough. Eleven
firms paid for it in the first year, mostly small practices where a
disappointing product would have been thrown out within a month.
Everything since has followed the same route. A customer describes
something they have to do twice, we watch them do it, and we decide
whether it belongs in the platform. Document assembly came from a
firm whose template folder had accumulated eleven versions of the
same lease. Deadline tracking came from a near miss that a partner
told us about on a Friday afternoon and asked us never to repeat.
Six years in, Lexoria is sixty-one people, still headquartered in
Vilnius, and still building for the same person: someone with too
many matters open who needs the right answer and needs it to be
defensible.